Expired50% confidenceTradeoffExact time
The new classifier was intentionally designed to be more aggressive, making it more prone to falsely flagging normal coding requests such as scanning codebases and searching for security vulnerabilities.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/23/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/21/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Claims
Unverified主流加固方案通常包含代码混淆、字符串加密、控制流平坦化、反调试检测以及SO库保护等多个保护层70% similarUnverified技术能力较强的改装者可能找到欺骗检测系统的方法，使软件误判隐私灯仍在正常工作70% similarUnverified信息安全中攻击面与代码量近似正相关，代码量精简的工具意味着更小的攻击面和更高可信度70% similarUnverified类型混淆漏洞发生在去优化路径上，是近年浏览器漏洞中最主流的利用原语之一69% similarUnverifiedCybersecurity capability can be seen as a byproduct of strong coding ability; models that can understand complex code logic and locate bugs inherently have the potential to discover security vulnerabilities.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/597307API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/597307MCP
get_claim(id=597307)