Expired75% confidenceEventTime unknown
The tester used VS Code Copilot with OPAI 4.7 to design the evaluation plan, and used Sonnet 4.6 to execute the evaluation and generate the report.
1
Sources
75%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
5/31/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 8/29/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the Pillow library RGB-to-HSV precision bug test, Claude Code using the Sonnet 4.6 model passed on the first attempt with clear logic, earning a perfect score.73% similarUnverifiedClaude Sonnet 4 proactively used curl commands to test API endpoints, verifying whether the data interfaces related to Cabinets and sensors returned data normally.73% similarVerifiedThe Sonnet model underlying Claude Code consistently leads on mainstream programming benchmarks such as HumanEval and SWE-bench.68% similarUnverifiedOpenAI's o-series models and Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet have achieved scores on code generation benchmarks (such as HumanEval and SWE-bench) that approach or exceed the average level of human programmers.68% similarUnverifiedThe tester proposed that the optimal workflow is for Sonnet to handle planning, Haiku sub-agents to execute specific operations, and Sonnet to handle final review.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/6033API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/6033MCP
get_claim(id=6033)