Verified90% confidenceOpinionTime unknown
AI code review is not intended to completely replace humans, but rather to form an efficient complement, where AI handles mechanical checks and humans handle architectural decisions and business logic judgments.
7
Sources
90%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
5/31/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe unique value of AI-assisted code review lies in its ability to combine specific business logic and call-chain context to deliver targeted judgments, rather than merely flagging rule-matched risk points84% similarUnverifiedAI should be positioned as an amplifier of audit efficiency rather than a replacement for human experts, and its output still requires professional judgment, oversight, and cross-validation.83% similarVerified业界将'AI负责生成、人类负责审查与验证'的原则称为human-in-the-loop（人在回路）83% similarUnverifiedA reasonable AI audit workflow is to have AI first perform a broad scan to flag suspicious areas, then have cryptography experts focus on in-depth verification, forming a collaborative model where AI is responsible for breadth and humans are responsible for depth.81% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/6047API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/6047MCP
get_claim(id=6047)