Expired50% confidenceFactTime unknown
Mainstream AI programming tools such as GitHub Copilot and Cursor have previously sparked controversy due to ambiguous wording in their terms of service regarding the use of code data.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedGitHub Copilot and Cursor have faced controversy over vague language in their terms of service regarding code data usage82% similarPartially VerifiedGitHub Copilot has limited understanding of entire codebases and relatively weaker refactoring capabilities compared to other AI coding tools.80% similarUnverifiedGitHub Copilot has primarily served development environments such as VS Code and JetBrains in the form of a plugin, with its value concentrated in scenarios such as code completion, comment generation, and unit test writing.79% similarUnverifiedGitHub Copilot、ChatGPT、Claude等AI工具的普及导致越来越多的Pull Request中混入AI生成的代码78% similarUnverifiedGitHub Copilot and Claude Code underlying call model services from different companies, and their API formats are completely incompatible.78% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/60608API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/60608MCP
get_claim(id=60608)