Expired60% confidenceSolutionExact time
The practice more widely accepted in academia is to use AI as an auxiliary tool for polishing, translation, and literature review, with explicit disclosure of AI usage in the paper.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/25/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/23/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe correct way to use AI for writing papers is to first obtain real literature from CNKI, then have AI assist in generating an outline framework rather than the full text, and finally organize the discussion in one's own words.81% similarUnverifiedAI生成的技术课程应作为理解的脚手架，关键细节仍需回到原始论文交叉验证76% similarUnverifiedSemantic-layer assertions require deep understanding of business rules and represent the current ceiling that AI-generated test cases struggle most to break through, which is also the fundamental reason why AI review cannot fully replace human review.75% similarUnverified演讲者主张学生在整个课程中包括考试都应该能够使用AI74% similarUnverifiedThe course author believes that the AI readability of a codebase—including clear directory structure, consistent naming conventions, sufficient type annotations, meaningful comments, and comprehensive documentation—has a far greater impact on AI output quality than the sophistication of prompts.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/613210API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/613210MCP
get_claim(id=613210)