Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
For one-on-one custom development scenarios where the goal is to disclaim liability and deliver on an as-is basis, a written development contract is more appropriate than the MIT License.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/4/2026
First Seen
Sources
MIT许可证能用于闭源代码吗？完整解析
Related Claims
UnverifiedIf a work does not qualify for copyright protection in the first place, attaching standard open-source licenses such as MIT or GPL to it is logically contradictory, because one cannot grant rights one does not hold.64% similarUnverifiedThe Apache 2.0 license, unlike the GPL family, allows users to integrate code into closed-source commercial products and includes explicit patent grant clauses, whereas the MIT license does not include an explicit grant of patent rights.63% similarUnverifiedOnce code from external contributors has been merged into a project, the consent of all contributors is required to change the license; otherwise it may constitute infringement.63% similarVerifiedMIT License是最宽松的开源许可协议，几乎可以随意使用，只需保留版权声明62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/683635API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/683635MCP
get_claim(id=683635)