Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
现有复现性检查清单以鼓励和自我报告为主，作者只需勾选是否提供代码，不提供代码不会直接导致拒稿
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
8/5/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/3/2026
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedCaution should be exercised regarding benchmark results reported from a single source by the project team itself, as details such as whether the test set is publicly available and how the human expert baseline is defined can significantly affect the persuasiveness of the conclusions.68% similarUnverifiedCodex has a built-in /review slash command that can analyze uncommitted code changes or committed PRs, automatically detect vulnerabilities, and provide modification suggestions.66% similarUnverified最有效的代码审查做法是让Review Agent拥有完全干净的上下文——不给它看原始需求和思考过程，只给它看最终的代码Diff66% similarUnverifiedThe /code-review command is currently better suited as an auxiliary check and discussion starting point, and cannot replace human judgment on business logic, architectural impact, and online risks.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/688921API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/688921MCP
get_claim(id=688921)