Unverified60% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
The Preparedness Framework stipulates that only models with a risk rating of medium or below may be deployed; higher ratings require additional mitigation measures, and models rated critical may not be deployed or further developed at all.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/6/2026
First Seen
Sources
OpenAI模型第三方网络安全评估：方法论与行业影响深度解析
Related Claims
Unverified准备框架规定：任何维度达到危急级别的模型须在安全措施到位前停止部署，达到高级别的模型需经安全委员会审批76% similarUnverifiedThe model output may not be a simple "yes/no" determination but a risk score, which is applied with different thresholds in different scenarios (more lenient for real-time developer reminders, stricter for security team audits).71% similarUnverifiedAnthropic's published "Responsible Scaling Policy" focuses mainly on model capability evaluation and safety measures, with relatively limited requirements for disclosing data sources.70% similarUnverifiedIn deployment environments where VRAM is constrained and cannot accommodate the large total parameter count of expert weights, dense models are the safer choice.69% similarUnverifiedThe Preparedness Framework sets capability levels for high-risk domains, typically divided from low to high into the tiers 'low,' 'medium,' 'high,' and 'critical.'69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/699011API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/699011MCP
get_claim(id=699011)