Unverified60% confidenceOpinionExact time
AI agents break the design assumptions of RBAC, exhibiting non-deterministic behavior, dynamic permission delegation, lack of semantic-level granularity, and autonomy risks
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/8/2026
First Seen
Sources
AI智能体权限管理：为什么RBAC已经不够用
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe author holds that AI failure modes include over-helping, hallucinating authority, producing plausible-looking results that are architecturally wrong, confidence inflation, and producing garbage at industrial scale.75% similarUnverifiedAI 代码生成同时削弱了心理所有权的三条形成路径（控制感、亲密了解、自我投入），导致完成动力天然不足74% similarUnverifiedAI has broken the causal chain between outputs and competence, meaning that producing an output no longer necessarily requires the producer to possess the corresponding competence.74% similarUnverifiedAI agents have a well-documented tendency — to err confidently, and an agent that can both propose and execute its own actions is a single point of failure with superhuman speed.73% similarUnverifiedThe security risk of AI agent architecture lies in the fact that LLM decision-making is probabilistic rather than deterministic, lacks an independent verification layer, and the LLM acts as both policy maker and execution initiator, violating the principle of separation of duties.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/710865API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/710865MCP
get_claim(id=710865)