Expired60% confidenceFactTime unknown
Compared to Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6 performs nearly on par on most benchmarks, but with faster inference speed and lower call costs.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
5/31/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 8/29/2026(expired)
Sources
OpenClaw企业部署指南：Sonnet 4.6+VPS打造团队AI智能体
bilibili安得广厦千万间678
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn agentic search tests, Sonnet 5 outperformed Sonnet 4.6 across all effort levels, but its overall performance was below Opus 4.8, placing it at approximately the Opus 4.7 level overall.82% similarUnverifiedSonnet 5 is only approximately 72% cheaper than Opus 4.8 Max.80% similarUnverifiedThe test chose Claude Sonnet 4.6 rather than Opus 4.7 as the baseline, on the grounds that Opus is too strong to provide a meaningful comparison.80% similarUnverifiedIn the agentic computer use benchmark, Opus 4.8 on the high setting and Sonnet 5 on the max setting perform comparably, but Sonnet 5 consumes more tokens77% similarUnverifiedTesters recommended continuing to use Opus 4.8 for the vast majority of tasks for better results, and considered Sonnet 5 disappointing.76% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/7446API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/7446MCP
get_claim(id=7446)