Unverified60% confidenceSolutionExact time
A common rule of thumb in the agent domain is that clearing context is better than compressing it — after completing a round of tasks, it is best to start a new conversation with /new, because context compression loses detail.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/22/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen giving instructions to an Agent, boundaries and objectives need to be defined more clearly than in chat, because it will proactively take actions76% similarUnverifiedThe longer an Agent runs and the more tool results and history accumulate, the more likely that the original task requirements and operational constraints will be lost during truncation and compression if everything is stuffed into the context; key constraints must be readable at every round of execution.75% similarUnverifiedThe more specific the instructions given to Agent mode and the more clearly the steps are broken down, the more accurate the execution results and the lower the rework rate.74% similarUnverifiedWhen using an Agent, multi-turn dialogue should be treated as part of the workflow, not expecting a perfect delivery in one go; the interaction process itself consumes credits, which is a normal cost of using an Agent.73% similarUnverifiedEarly Agent frameworks often concatenated the entire conversation history losslessly, and as the number of rounds increased, input Tokens would grow quadratically; Hermes Agent retains only fragments relevant to the current task through strategies such as summary compression and on-demand retrieval, making the per-round cost stable during long-term operation.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/787341API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/787341MCP
get_claim(id=787341)