Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
当第一版出现漂移时，应问ChatGPT哪个约束定义得不够充分，进行诊断式迭代而非直接重写提示词
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/23/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn this incident, ChatGPT played the role of an auditor—performing line-by-line comparison of definitions and coefficient conventions, identifying normalization inconsistencies and contradictory conclusions—rather than constructing an original mathematical proof.65% similarUnverified直接将JS文件发给ChatGPT补环境效果通常不理想，原因包括AI不了解目标网站具体检测逻辑、补出的环境不够真实、缺少系统化方法论59% similarUnverified涉及对外发布的引语和数据通常仍需客户方确认，因此No follow-ups承诺在实际落地中更适合理解为大幅减少来回沟通而非彻底取消确认流程57% similarUnverified标准自回归模型逐Token从左到右生成文本，在时间步t仅依赖之前的输出，缺乏自我审查和回溯机制，导致错误积累效应57% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/791458API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/791458MCP
get_claim(id=791458)