Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
When AI systems can materially affect an individual's income, access, or social standing, human oversight is a legal obligation rather than an optional product design choice.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/5/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedUnder the current legal system, AI is regarded as a tool rather than a legal subject, and the legal consequences of its actions are generally borne by the user or developer.78% similarUnverifiedAI机构公开承诺重视人类福祉本身会形成约束力，为公众与监管者提供衡量企业行为的标尺77% similarUnverifiedThe question of AI liability attribution is commonly evaded through instrumentalism by characterizing AI as a tool rather than an agent, thereby transferring responsibility to the user.76% similarUnverifiedThe real risks of AI governance arise after AI systems are connected to internal data and business processes, not at the access-decision stage.75% similarUnverifiedIndirect prompt injection can cause AI agents to execute unauthorized operations within the scope of legitimate permissions, rendering traditional permission-checking mechanisms ineffective.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/858940API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/858940MCP
get_claim(id=858940)