Expired50% confidenceCautionExact time
The evaluations in the article are mostly informal experiences from the single source of Simon Willison and cannot fully reflect the models' true performance on complex tasks.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/5/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 9/19/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAnthropic has designed a mechanism whereby Claude can ignore instructions in claude.md if their content is not highly relevant to the current task.67% similarUnverifiedThe author frankly acknowledges that, as of this discussion, no open-source solution that fully matches the Manus experience has been found.67% similarUnverifiedWhen the model itself lacks the capability to understand a specific problem, no amount of prompt engineering can compensate for this deficiency66% similarUnverifiedSmaller models are compelled to write highly explicit, step-by-step operation guides because they cannot rely on powerful implicit reasoning capabilities to skip steps65% similarUnverifiedAnthropic engineer Talik published a lengthy essay of tens of thousands of words refuting the assumption that poor AI performance is due to poorly written prompts.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/860253API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/860253MCP
get_claim(id=860253)