Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The activated parameter count of Qwen3.8 Flash is approximately one-third that of GLM.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/6/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/5/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn the comprehensive intelligence index AA, Qwen3.8 Flash Next scored 56, the cloud version of Qwen3.8 Flash scored 57, and DeepSeek V4 Flash scored 52.74% similarUnverifiedQwen3.8-Flash-Next has approximately 6B activated parameters.74% similarVerifiedQwen3.5's parameter activation rate is 4.3%, while DeepSeek V3's 671B model has an activation rate of 5.5%.68% similarUnverifiedAccording to official data, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next surpasses Claude Opus 4.6 Max in both text and multimodal domains with only 6B activated parameters, and its training cost is only one-ninth of Qwen3.7-Plus.67% similarUnverifiedThe official statement indicates that HY3 outperforms Deepseek V4 Flash, which has a comparable parameter scale, in most scenarios, and scored higher on average than the GLM series models in internal blind tests66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/863642API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/863642MCP
get_claim(id=863642)