Unverified60% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the Terminal Bench 4.0 highest-accuracy test, Fable 5.1 achieved an accuracy of 55.8% at a cost of $19.50, while Astra achieved an accuracy of 56.7% at a cost of $10.35.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/9/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/8/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn Automation Bench at medium reasoning intensity, GPT-6.1 Sol scored 35.4%, which is 2.2 percentage points higher than Opus 5.5 at one-third of the cost.70% similarUnverifiedAS5048 数据手册中标注的实际精度（考虑积分非线性误差 INL）通常在 ±0.5 度左右69% similarUnverifiedIn the LongMemEval benchmark, BM25 accuracy improved from 78.8% to 85.2% with 5 chunks.69% similarUnverifiedOn UniQL's Oracle dialect task, the best published result (single-attempt accuracy) is 49.61%, achieved by Claude Sonnet 4.5; Gemini 2.5 Pro's accuracy is 26.14%.67% similarUnverifiedIn this benchmark, LangGraph achieved a success rate of 77.6%, an average completion time of 31.2 seconds, and an average token cost of 12,143.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/881470API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/881470MCP
get_claim(id=881470)