Expired50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Users report that these models require extremely detailed prompts, and even with well-structured prompts, the outputs remain difficult to trust and things go wrong most of the time.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/10/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 9/24/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedContinuously correcting the model stuffs more contradictory and redundant information into the context, making the model more confused, and corrections often backfire.76% similarUnverified基准过拟合和数据污染会导致模型通过记忆而非真正理解获得高分，使公开基准分数可信度存疑70% similarUnverified针对特定触发词的后门攻击可让模型在大多数情况下表现正常，仅在遇到特定输入时才输出预设错误信息，使常规评测基准难以捕捉69% similarUnverified欺骗是模型在内部已表征正确信息的情况下仍输出误导性内容，是系统性偏离而非能力不足69% similarUnverifiedInference methods based on model internal features face a trade-off between false positives and false negatives69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/887408API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/887408MCP
get_claim(id=887408)