Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The 1995 ruling in Stratton Oakmont v. Prodigy held that if an online service provider edits or moderates user content, it may be treated as a publisher and held liable for defamation.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified从番茄小说等网文平台改编现有故事存在版权风险56% similarUnverified1964年的《纽约时报诉沙利文案》确立了'实际恶意'标准，要求公职人员就批评性言论提起诽谤诉讼时必须证明发言者明知内容虚假或对真相漠然置之56% similarUnverifiedAnthropic has stated that more than 91% of the constrained authors and publishers have received compensation, and the settlement distinguished between training an AI and storing pirated books, the latter involving more than 7 million books.55% similarUnverifiedThe U.S. Copyright Office's position that AI-generated content requires human authorship was upheld by the court in Thaler v. Perlmutter.55% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/893482API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/893482MCP
get_claim(id=893482)