Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Inter-annotator agreement among different human annotators in open-ended text quality assessment is typically only 0.6–0.8.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe study found that the faithfulness score for counterfactual inputs was only 0.05 points lower than for factual inputs (on a 1–5 scale), a difference that is almost negligible.68% similarUnverified普通网页用户行为分析所用的采样率通常不足10Hz62% similarUnverifiedBehaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) can improve inter-rater reliability from 0.4–0.6 for unstructured assessments to 0.7–0.9.62% similarUnverified在事实性评估任务上模型评判者准确率仍显著低于人类专家，但在风格、连贯性等主观维度已接近人类评审员间一致性水平62% similarUnverifiedIn financial statements, character accuracy may be as high as 99%, but semantic accuracy may be less than 50%.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/894787API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/894787MCP
get_claim(id=894787)