Unverified50% confidenceTradeoffExact time
In secret scanning scenarios, both false positives and false negatives carry extremely high costs: false negatives may lead to data breaches, while false positives overwhelm security teams with large volumes of invalid alerts
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedImproper handling of padded routes can cause the output of real tokens to be overwritten or mixed with garbage values, and errors are significantly amplified when batch sizes are small and the number of experts is large.70% similarUnverifiedThe false positive rate of mature commercial vulnerability scanners often fluctuates between 30% and 70%, AI agents in complex scenarios may have an even higher misjudgment rate, and SRC platforms have penalty mechanisms for accounts that frequently submit invalid reports.70% similarUnverifiedIn data quality validation, the costs of different errors are asymmetric: incorrectly accepting dirty data may cause downstream analysis to break down, while falsely rejecting good data only loses one sample.68% similarUnverifiedTraditional manual content moderation is costly and difficult to scale, while rule-based filtering systems are prone to high false-positive rates.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/898411API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/898411MCP
get_claim(id=898411)