Expired60% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the cube unfolding and 3D folding question, both V4.1 Flash and V4 Flash produced blank screens and failed, V4 Pro had a correct unfolding diagram but failed due to incorrect closure logic, and JLM 5.3 Flash performed best.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 9/25/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe V4.1 Flash beta is open with no barriers—anyone with API access can use it, at a price identical to the current V4 Flash.75% similarUnverifiedThis evaluation used six composite questions covering front-end, reasoning, and causality, with V4.1 Flash, V4 Flash, V4 Pro with deep thinking enabled, and JLM 5.3 Flash tested back-to-back on the same questions.75% similarUnverifiedIn spatial reconstruction accuracy for 3D room rendering, DeepSeek V4 Flash outperforms Qwen3 Next Flash.75% similarUnverifiedV4.1 Flash surpassed Opus 5 on the DeepSWE benchmark by a narrow margin of 0.2 points.73% similarUnverifiedV4.1 Flash adopts a new CED (Causal Encoding) architecture, whose core idea is an asymmetry in computation between input and output.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/900423API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/900423MCP
get_claim(id=900423)