Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Whether a scientific theory is right or wrong is determined by the rigor of its logic and the reproducible verification of experiments, not by the number of supporters or opponents.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedFormal verification can only guarantee the internal consistency of a reasoning chain; it cannot automatically determine whether the proposition being proved is semantically fully equivalent to the original conjecture.76% similarUnverified一致性检验只能降低幻觉概率，无法根除，如果所有推理路径基于同一错误的共识性偏见会共振出一致但错误的答案75% similarUnverifiedPrevious research on LLM moral judgment has largely been based on two unrealistic assumptions: single-turn judgment and pressure-based rebuttal.72% similarUnverifiedThe researchers argue that assuming reasoning traces possess human-like or algorithmically interpretable semantics is not only unnecessary but potentially misleading.72% similarUnverifiedIn agent systems, erroneous intermediate reasoning results may be treated as factual basis by subsequent steps, creating error cascades.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/901876API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/901876MCP
get_claim(id=901876)