Unverified60% confidenceOpinionExact time
Real productivity gains often come not from improving the efficiency of individual steps, but from eliminating friction between steps.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen generation is no longer the bottleneck, the room for improving engineering efficiency shifts from "getting the AI to do more work" to "letting people see faster and more accurately" — this is not a tooling problem but a way-of-working problem.77% similarUnverifiedGains in productivity and the preservation of cognitive depth are often difficult to achieve simultaneously.77% similarUnverifiedThe core logic of the Productivity Paradox is that there is a structural misalignment between technology investment and actual output, as the learning, coordination, and maintenance costs introduced by new tools often offset or even exceed efficiency gains in the short term.74% similarUnverifiedJevons Paradox states that an increase in tool efficiency often does not reduce labor input in that field, but instead expands the overall demand for output.72% similarUnverified只强调性能而忽视效率的模型在实际规模化部署时难以为继68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/902980API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/902980MCP
get_claim(id=902980)