Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The authors note that this significance may be affected by the small sample size and multiple comparisons, and could be due to chance.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
Unverified泰特洛克的研究得出结论：专家预测的准确率仅略高于随机猜测，甚至不如简单的统计基准线75% similarUnverifiedResearch shows that in certain tasks, simply changing '请判断' to '请分析' in a prompt can cause accuracy fluctuations of 5–10 percentage points.70% similarUnverifiedThe study found that models' accuracy on semantically plausible distorted statements is actually higher than their performance on meaningless random replacements.70% similarUnverifiedStatistical significance does not equal practical significance; even if the p-value is very small, if the actual improvement is negligible its engineering value remains limited—this corresponds in statistics to the distinction between statistical power and effect size.69% similarVerifiedResearch shows that the output quality of the same model can vary by several times under different prompts.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/903351API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/903351MCP
get_claim(id=903351)