Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
The author stated that the evaluation protocol and scoring methodology need to be stabilized before submissions are opened.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 9/25/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedSeveral approaches have emerged in the evaluation field to address timeliness: releasing new versions periodically, using private test set models, and generating new questions programmatically.69% similarUnverified只要有一位审稿人愿意提分或展现出理解，就值得继续等待meta-review68% similarUnverifiedCaution should be exercised regarding benchmark results reported from a single source by the project team itself, as details such as whether the test set is publicly available and how the human expert baseline is defined can significantly affect the persuasiveness of the conclusions.67% similarUnverifiedThe result still requires rigorous scrutiny and peer review from the independent mathematics community.66% similarUnverifiedARR作者指南FAQ规定：若提交较早周期的评审而非最新版本，需同时提供指向较新提交的链接和一段说明解释为何较新评审存在问题66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/903425API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/903425MCP
get_claim(id=903425)