Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
A reliable Agent implementation should set a call limit and clear exit conditions, and should adapt or stop and seek human intervention when encountering timeouts, empty data, or insufficient permissions.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAgent可部署的软件分发模式降低了技术门槛，但部署可靠性取决于Agent的理解准确度，调试失败时普通用户可能缺乏排错能力74% similarUnverifiedIf the approval threshold is too loose, control is lost; if too strict, the benefits of automation are lost — the true balance is letting the Agent handle the vast majority of processes while inserting lightweight human confirmation only at critical decision nodes.73% similarUnverifiedThe stopping conditions for an Agent cannot be left entirely to the model itself to decide; external programs must pre-set hard limits such as maximum execution rounds, runtime, token consumption, and cost caps.72% similarUnverifiedWhen an Agent has low confidence in a decision it should proactively trigger human intervention, while directly passing through high-confidence routine operations.72% similarUnverifiedAgents should be granted minimal privileges—for example, an agent that only needs to read logs should not have the ability to write to the database—and the clearer the permission boundaries, the more controllable the scope of damage in the event of a loss of control70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/908715API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/908715MCP
get_claim(id=908715)