Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time

On SWE Bench Pro, Glimmer narrowly beat Qwen with 51.2 vs. 50.2, but Qwen surpassed it on SWE Bench Verified (Qwen 77.2 vs. 76) and Terminal Bench (Qwen 60.7 vs. 51.7).

1

Sources

50%

Confidence

Medium-term (~90 days)

Relevance

9/11/2026

First Seen

Valid until: 12/10/2026

Sources

Meta Muse Glimmer Quantization Benchmark: Running a 30B Model in 14GB of RAM as an Agent

Related Entities

Muse Glimmermodel Qwen 3.6model SWE Bench Proconcept SWE Bench Verifiedconcept Terminal Benchconcept

Related Claims

UnverifiedIn the Terminal Bench test, Qwen 3.6 27B scored approximately 60.7, while Muse Glimmer scored only 51.7, falling significantly behind.75% similar UnverifiedQwen3.8-Flash-Next achieved scores of 58.7 and 62.5 on the SWE-bench 1.1 and SWE-bench Pro evaluations, respectively.73% similar VerifiedQwen3.6 27B scored 77.2 on SWE-bench Verified.73% similar UnverifiedQwen 3 Max scored 65 points across eight tests with a score rate of 81.25%, ranking second on the reviewer's leaderboard, behind only the Claude flagship with a score rate of 82.5%.67% similar

Cite This Claim

Stable URI

https://kongchang.com/claim/909117

API

curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/909117

MCP

get_claim(id=909117)