Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
With a success rate comparable to DeepSeek V4 Pro, the per-task cost of GLM-5.3 Flash is only one-eighth that of V4 Pro.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/10/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedV4 Pro cost approximately 16 yuan to build one 3D procedural generator, while V4.1 Flash cost less than 10 yuan to develop two projects.79% similarUnverifiedIn terms of cost-effectiveness metrics for software engineering, the true value for money may still lie with DeepSeek V4 Flash.77% similarUnverifiedIn that test, DeepSeek V4 Flash official release was approximately 3.6 times faster than the Pro preview version.75% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek V4 Flash is a distilled or streamlined version of Pro that significantly reduces inference overhead while retaining core programming capabilities.73% similarUnverifiedIn DeepSeek V4 Flash deployments, DiSpark improved single-user generation speed by 60% to 85%, and the Pro series by 57% to 78%, while maintaining equivalent inference quality73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/909338API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/909338MCP
get_claim(id=909338)