Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Caveman's fixed benchmark test results from 54 runs show a 33.2% reduction in input tokens, with all 18/18 correctness checks passing.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/11/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe locally run Gemma 26B achieved an accuracy of only 49.2% across 453 scored predictions, while its paired always-predict-up baseline had an accuracy of 53.4%.68% similarUnverifiedIn tests on 2,456 held-out prompts, increasing the sampling steps from 20 to 50 improved FID only from 27.0 to 26.6 (a gain of 0.4), while removing the shift caused FID to rise from 27.0 to 27.3 and FD-DINOv2 to rise from 218 to 228.67% similarUnverifiedCaveman is a newly launched tool with only 6 comments, a limited benchmark sample size of 54 runs, and validation is still at an early stage.66% similarUnverified在 Terminal Bench 2.1 测试中，AutoPrompt Scale 使 OpenCode 在 89 个任务中的失败数从 29 降到 16，多解决 13 题，分数提升 14.61 个百分点64% similarUnverifiedIn guided mode, the average end-to-end accuracy increased from 28.6% to 33.7%, and the ambiguity detection F1 score increased from 45.3% to 64.9%64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/914494API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/914494MCP
get_claim(id=914494)