Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Research that is later proven wrong was reasonable and well-formed when proposed, representing science's normal process of self-correction.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedPopper argued that for a theory to qualify as a scientific theory, it must be capable of being proven wrong through observation or experiment.71% similarUnverified论文首次提出模型在反直觉场景中的谬误与反物理失败在本质上是同源的69% similarUnverifiedQuadrillion Labs proposes the view that the endpoint of scientific research is not a simple right or wrong, but rather insights that lead to more questions.61% similarVerifiedA 2023 Stanford University study challenged the phenomenon of "emergence," arguing that it is largely an artifact of the choice of evaluation metrics rather than a genuine sudden shift in model capability.61% similarUnverified进化心理学家Martie Haselton和David Buss将不对称的错误管理逻辑系统化为错误管理理论60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/916702API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/916702MCP
get_claim(id=916702)