Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Research administrators evaluate the value of research and do so for rational reasons, even though their judgment is not always effective.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedJudging the intellectual integrity of a piece of research requires placing it in its historical context, rather than applying modern standards retrospectively across the board.67% similarUnverifiedFor tasks involving moral and value judgments, an increasing number of researchers advocate adopting a 'disagreement-aware' modeling approach, preserving annotator disagreement information rather than simply taking a majority vote.67% similarUnverifiedResearch by Harvard Business Review indicates that data scientists who can effectively convey analytical insights to non-technical audiences have a several-times higher probability of seeing their projects actually adopted and generating business impact.66% similarUnverified审查标注分歧比只看一致率数字更有价值，应研究为什么不同意而非只看同意了什么65% similarUnverified判断榜单参考价值取决于评选标准是否透明、评审团队是否专业以及评选依据是否基于实质性贡献65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/916704API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/916704MCP
get_claim(id=916704)