Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
According to the OSAID standard, well-known open models such as Llama 3 and Gemma do not meet the strict definition of open source.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedDue to usage restrictions, Llama models do not meet OSI's strict definition of open source; the more accurate term used in the industry is open-weight models.75% similarUnverifiedMeta's LLaMA series and Mistral follow an open-weight model rather than strict open source.64% similarUnverifiedMeta's LLaMA series and the GLM series are both open weight rather than strictly open source.64% similarUnverifiedIn a closed-door meeting, Liang Wenfeng drew clear boundaries for DeepSeek: no multimodality, no world models, no consumer-facing products, focusing solely on achieving AGI through open source.63% similarUnverifiedIn the open-source AI definition draft released by the Open Source Initiative (OSI) in 2024, it was stated that models that only make weight files public without disclosing training data and code should not be recognized as truly open-source software.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/919623API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/919623MCP
get_claim(id=919623)