Unverified70% confidenceOpinionExact time
The paper's conclusions are based on the model versions at the time of testing and represent a snapshot as of the test date, not a permanent judgment.
2
Sources
70%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/14/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/13/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe study's methodology pre-registered hypotheses, thresholds, and analysis methods, used deterministic regular expressions for scoring rather than a large model as judge, and calculated confidence intervals via bill-level clustered bootstrapping.76% similarUnverified选择和使用不同模型档位时不能仅凭版本号判断，基于真实场景的多轮测试才是评估模型能力的可靠依据76% similarUnverifiedModel regression testing reruns a fixed evaluation set after changing prompts, model versions, or retrieval configurations and compares whether the pass rate has declined; the determination methods include scoring thresholds, semantic similarity, or LLM-as-judge, with statistical comparison across multiple samples.76% similarUnverified审计级对抗测试证据应包含被测系统精确版本标识、测试用例版本快照、通过失败判定量化标准及完整测试时间戳75% similarUnverifiedIn this benchmark, each response contains two parts: a <think> block recording the model's stated reasoning process, and a <final> block specifying the action it intends to execute; a judge model first evaluates the final action, assigning labels such as SHORTCUT, HONEST_FAIL, and LEGIT_ESCALATION, with the reasoning trace serving as supporting evidence rather than the sole basis for judgment.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/921080API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/921080MCP
get_claim(id=921080)