Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Across a total of 446 pairwise comparisons, CTD statistically significantly outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in 72.9% of cases.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn 446 pairwise comparisons, CTD performed comparably in 21.1% of cases and was statistically significantly inferior to its competitors in only 6.1% of cases.77% similarUnverifiedFor the 7B model, accuracy with the solver was 75.31% versus 72.02% for direct calculation, a paired improvement of +3.29 percentage points, with a 95% cluster interval of [-3.49, 10.38] crossing zero, making the advantage non-significant.66% similarUnverified最优过程与参考过程的速度场之差恰好等于值函数的梯度（adjoint/伴随量）63% similarUnverified在歧义点的四类行为中，'先搜再问'成功率最高，平均通过率达93.4%，远高于'直接猜'的56.5%，'搜多次再猜'为51.5%62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/921696API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/921696MCP
get_claim(id=921696)