Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The same DeepSeek v1.1 model scored between 69.8% and 74.2% on Terminal Bench 2.0 under different harnesses.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/15/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/14/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe flagship Soul achieved a score of 91.9% on the Terminal Bench 2.1 benchmark.70% similarUnverifiedSWE-2 achieved a score of 92.8 on the Terminal-Bench 2.1 benchmark.67% similarUnverifiedOn the SWE-Bench Multilingual benchmark, HY3 scored 75.8, slightly behind DeepSeek V4 Pro's 76.2.64% similarUnverifiedOn DeepSWE, model scores range from 70% for the top-performing GPT 5.5 to 0% for the bottom-performing Claude Haiku 4.5, with a level of differentiation far greater than the concentrated interval of approximately 30 points on SWE-Bench Pro.64% similarUnverifiedAccording to Artificial Analysis leaderboard data, DeepSeek V4 Pro's score increased from 52 to 53, a difference of only 1 point.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/923846API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/923846MCP
get_claim(id=923846)