Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On a three-sample math problem, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scored 74 points, on par with Opus 5.0 and surpassing GLM's 67 points and V4 Pro's 62 points.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/16/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/15/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedV4.1 Flash offers three levels of reasoning intensity—low, medium, and highest—with the average score across eight reasoning benchmarks rising from 67.1 to 76.3, at the cost of approximately 2.5 times more output tokens.78% similarUnverifiedV4.1-Flash scored 74.2 points on a certain programming test dimension, an improvement of nearly 20 points over V4-Flash.76% similarUnverifiedThe official statement indicates that HY3 outperforms Deepseek V4 Flash, which has a comparable parameter scale, in most scenarios, and scored higher on average than the GLM series models in internal blind tests74% similarUnverifiedOn the comprehensive intelligence index AA, Qwen3.8 Flash Next scored 56, the cloud version of Qwen3.8 Flash scored 57, and DeepSeek V4 Flash scored 52.74% similarUnverifiedV4 Pro's parameter count is nearly 6 times that of the Flash model, yet its actual performance has not opened up a significant gap.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/924488API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/924488MCP
get_claim(id=924488)