Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
An appeals court ruling rejecting expansive copyright claims does not directly determine whether AI training is lawful
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/17/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe UK Supreme Court rejected the request to list an AI as an inventor.68% similarUnverifiedThe U.S. Copyright Office's 2023 AI copyright guidelines have not yet clearly defined the copyright ownership of model outputs used as training data.67% similarUnverifiedIf courts rule that AI training constitutes copyright infringement, legitimate activities such as search engine web indexing and caching, text mining, and large-scale data analysis in academic research could all be implicated67% similarUnverifiedSection 107 of U.S. copyright law permits unauthorized use of copyrighted works in contexts such as commentary, education, and research (the fair use doctrine), but whether commercial AI training qualifies as transformative use remains disputed.67% similarUnverifiedAI training data is often used without explicit authorization from the original authors, which is the core source of copyright disputes.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/929948API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/929948MCP
get_claim(id=929948)