Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the second-round Snake test, the basic gameplay of both agents was functional, with the result judged as essentially even; GameAgent had richer visual elements while Pink was more minimal.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/17/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/1/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the second round, Pink encountered an anomaly that prevented the task from completing fully, but the Snake game that had already been generated was still playable.71% similarUnverifiedSimple player-versus-AI elements appeared in the generated Snake game, including an AI-controlled object with functioning collision detection.68% similarUnverifiedThe results of Coday generating a Snake game are consistent with those generated directly using Cursor or Devin.67% similarUnverifiedIn practice, AI programming tools can automatically generate a playable game with mouse control, a scoring mechanism, and collision-end logic from a single instruction such as "make a Snake game."66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/930541API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/930541MCP
get_claim(id=930541)