Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
The process applies human review to the top 10% most suspicious actions, and the author considers human review to be the truly life-saving component.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/18/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe results of the paper's experiments were scored and evaluated by the original paper's authors themselves.63% similarUnverifiedRetraction Watch等学术监督组织已记录了数百篇因疑似AI生成而被撤回的论文，其中医学领域占比显著62% similarUnverifiedPublished papers undergo a rigorous selection process from idea inception through experimental validation, peer review, and multiple rounds of revision, with only a small fraction of ideas making it to public publication.59% similarUnverifiedArticles directly generated by Doubao are judged by Zhuque as suspected AI-written.58% similarUnverifiedThe document became a focal point of controversy in post-event investigations, used to discuss whether intelligence warnings had been given sufficient attention57% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/932328API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/932328MCP
get_claim(id=932328)