Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the Phase 2 human-AI collaborative assisted re-review mode, the foundation produced 202 evaluations through criterion-by-criterion re-assessment, and SAGE's consistency improved to kappa = 0.58, reaching a moderate-to-high level.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/21/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the Phase 1 post-hoc comparison, SAGE's evaluation results were compared against 105 human reviews from the original competition, yielding an ordinal consistency of kappa = 0.29, which falls in the "fair" range.74% similarUnverifiedIn a blind test of real-world workflows involving 270 interdisciplinary experts, the Hunyuan model scored 2.67/4, outperforming the GLM series' score of 2.51/4.65% similarUnverifiedFrank Schmidt和John Hunter在1998年发表的元分析研究（涵盖85年的研究数据）发现工作样本测试的预测效度约为0.54，结构化面试约为0.51，非结构化面试约为0.38，学历证书约为0.1065% similarUnverifiedIn the title-abstract screening stage, when researchers provide explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria, model F2 scores can improve by 28.8%64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/938115API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/938115MCP
get_claim(id=938115)