Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Even experienced human experts performing the same review task often achieve inter-group Kappa values of only 0.4–0.6.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/21/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA study published in Nature in 2020 found that Cohen's Kappa coefficient for different reviewers' scores on the same paper is typically less than 0.3.77% similarUnverifiedCohen's Kappa coefficient is suitable for scenarios with two reviewers and categorical variables; its value ranges from -1 to 1, and a value above 0.6 is generally considered moderate agreement, while above 0.8 is considered high agreement.76% similarUnverifiedThe standard interpretation of Cohen's Kappa is typically: κ < 0.20 slight, 0.21–0.40 fair, 0.41–0.60 moderate, 0.61–0.80 substantial, and above 0.80 almost perfect.68% similarUnverified在量化内容分析中，编码者间信度通常使用Cohen's Kappa或Krippendorff's Alpha系数衡量，一般要求达到0.7以上才算可接受65% similarUnverifiedThe study found that the faithfulness score for counterfactual inputs was only 0.05 points lower than for factual inputs (on a 1–5 scale), a difference that is almost negligible.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/938121API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/938121MCP
get_claim(id=938121)