Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Among the panel of ten LLM reviewers used as the primary reviewer pool in the study, the average pairwise correlation coefficient of reviewer errors was 0.21.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/23/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe accuracy data in the test has an error margin of approximately ±8–10 percentage points at n=100 sample size (based on a 95% confidence-level binomial confidence interval).79% similarUnverified2023年的分析显示主流LLM在生成学术引用时的错误率从30%到超过60%不等73% similarUnverifiedIn the experiments, the task resolution rate was 17% for zero-shot generation, 27% for generic self-correction, 23% for error-only feedback, and 90% for diagnostic counterexample feedback (A-CEGIS).71% similarUnverified业界仿真精度评估通常要求吞吐量误差小于15%70% similarUnverifiedTheoretically reliable clustered standard error estimation typically requires at least 30–50 clusters, whereas this study has only 19 independent time units, making the sample size relatively small.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/942777API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/942777MCP
get_claim(id=942777)