Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On pure reasoning tasks, Qwen3 27B scores only 30.8 on HLE, notably behind Opus's score of 40.0.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/24/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/23/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the Terminal Bench test, Qwen 3.6 27B scored approximately 60.7, while Muse Glimmer scored only 51.7, falling significantly behind.71% similarUnverifiedThe MoE version of Qwen3-235B has only approximately 22B parameters actually activated.71% similarUnverifiedThe author noted that other models previously tested, such as 35B and 3B variants, actually performed worse than the Q2 version of Qwen3 27B on the Kanban task.71% similarUnverifiedResearch shows that 30B-parameter models have a success rate 15–30 percentage points lower than GPT-4/Claude-3.5 on complex reasoning tasks.70% similarUnverifiedThe Qwen3.6 34B 80-layer model achieves an MTP speculative decoding acceptance rate of approximately 78% on LM Studio, while the original 27B achieves only approximately 57–58%69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/947048API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/947048MCP
get_claim(id=947048)