Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The mixed version (GPT-6 Astra for planning and review + GLM 5.3 Flash for writing all code) consumes approximately one-quarter the tokens of the pure Claude version while performing almost on par.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/25/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/9/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedUnder comparable performance, GPT-6 Astra's Token cost is approximately half that of Claude Fable 5.1.78% similarUnverifiedReferencing the LiveBench benchmark, Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra have comparable capabilities.77% similarUnverifiedGPT-6 Astra tends to generate better, more usable versions on the first attempt, with a high first-pass success rate and fast speed; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash improves quality through continuous self-checking and iteration but takes longer77% similarUnverifiedBilibili UP host 曹涛叔叔 tested the modeling and layout capabilities of multiple large models—including GPT-6 (Astra), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM 3.8 Flash, and GLM 5.3—using a real design project.76% similarUnverifiedV4.1-Flash scores 1 point higher than a GPT-5.6-level model in comparison.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/948708API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/948708MCP
get_claim(id=948708)