Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Each gold-standard contradiction is detectable on the basis of its evidence alone (recall 1.000), indicating no information gap at the data level and pointing to the retrieval stage rather than reasoning ability as the source of the problem.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/25/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified封闭世界假设指系统只承认知识库中明确存在的事实为真，任何未被记录的信息均被视为假72% similarUnverifiedWhen faced with isolated headline information lacking supporting materials, the rigorous approach is to label it as 'unverified' and seek multi-party confirmation, rather than spreading it with a tone of certainty.71% similarUnverifiedEnd-to-end prompting methods entangle the three components of evidence retrieval, reasoning, and uncertainty estimation, making it difficult to pinpoint the source of errors.69% similarUnverifiedPassing brief summaries is low-cost but may erase critical evidence and quietly turn inferences into facts, preventing downstream agents from determining whether information represents an explicit decision or a model guess.69% similarUnverifiedIn data quality validation, the costs of different errors are asymmetric: incorrectly accepting dirty data may cause downstream analysis to break down, while falsely rejecting good data only loses one sample.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/949064API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/949064MCP
get_claim(id=949064)