Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
To complete the 250-case test, FP8 27B took 36 minutes and 27 seconds, while Flash-Next IQ4_XS took 2 hours, 5 minutes, and 47 seconds, a difference of approximately 3.5 times.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/25/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/9/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe 26-billion-parameter Gemma (MoE) achieved a measured speed of nearly 31 tokens/second, about one-third faster than GPT-OSS 20B.68% similarUnverifiedIn mixed-precision training, each FP16 parameter occupies 2 bytes of GPU memory, and each FP32 parameter occupies 4 bytes of GPU memory.67% similarUnverifiedQwen3 27B achieved a 100% pass rate in the 256K long-context memory retrieval test (needle in a haystack), with all 15 runs being accurate.66% similarUnverifiedIn Theo's skate bench test, the X high tier averaged 338 tokens per response, took 6 seconds, and peaked at 31 seconds for the slowest response.66% similarUnverifiedIn the SVG rubber duck cycling generation test, Qwen 35B-A3B delivered the best overall performance, with a generation time of approximately 4 minutes.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/949602API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/949602MCP
get_claim(id=949602)