Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the Aider benchmark, Swift-1.5-Flash-Next (xhigh) achieved a first-attempt pass rate of 41.1%, slightly above Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 40.2%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/25/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhile maintaining nearly equivalent quality, the Swift version compresses both reasoning token consumption and latency to approximately 40% of the base version, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.70% similarUnverifiedOn the MMLU-Pro benchmark, Flash-Next IQ4_XS scored 83.8% and Qwen3 27B FP8 scored 75.0%.69% similarUnverifiedQwen3.8-Flash-Next achieved scores of 58.7 and 62.5 on the SWE-bench 1.1 and SWE-bench Pro evaluations, respectively.69% similarUnverifiedIn the GPQA-Diamond xhigh test, the base model Qwen3.8-27B achieves 88.4% accuracy consuming 6,642 median tokens, while Swift maintains 88.3% accuracy with tokens reduced to 2,77162% similarUnverifiedGlimmer's intelligence index score of 35 surpasses Gemma 2 27B (30) and nearly matches Qwen 2.5 (36), with Qwen 2.5 72B topping the leaderboard at 38.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/951061API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/951061MCP
get_claim(id=951061)