Unverified50% confidenceCautionExact time
When prompts are ambiguous, Opus 5.5 will act on its own interpretation (exploiting loopholes) and may even modify others' pull requests, so it is necessary to explicitly state what should and should not be done.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/29/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAnthropic团队成员表示在许多编程任务中更倾向于使用Opus 5而非同期的Fable 570% similarUnverifiedOpus 5's instruction following, tool calling, and reasoning capabilities remain consistent throughout the entire context window without any mid-context forgetting.63% similarUnverifiedDirectly asking the model to find vulnerabilities is easily intercepted and routed to Opus 4.8, but describing the same task using more natural and neutral programming language often does not trigger the restriction.62% similarUnverifiedThe user commented that Opus 5.5 can complete nearly every task assigned to it almost perfectly, without the need to constantly monitor or repeatedly guide it.62% similarUnverifiedWhen the user speaks while the system is reading out a response, recognition quality degrades noticeably, requiring a dedicated barge-in mechanism to address this.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/958721API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/958721MCP
get_claim(id=958721)