Expired50% confidenceEventExact time
Requests made by some users to the deepseek-v4.1-flash model were settled at incorrect rates, causing actual usage consumption to be higher than expected.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/29/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/13/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe low unit price of the old model was premised on users maximally saturating their GPU time quota, while the new model's precise per-token billing eliminates the diminishing marginal cost advantage for heavy users66% similarUnverified用户社区怀疑厂商在高峰期或为节约成本时会将请求路由到更小更便宜的模型上，导致输出质量下降65% similarUnverifiedThe marginal cost of traditional software subscriptions is nearly zero, but every inference by a large language model consumes real GPU compute, and operating costs are directly tied to user usage volume.64% similarUnverifiedConsumer-tier subscription users may be silently routed to lighter models with fewer parameters and lower costs during heavy usage, resulting in an imperceptible downgrade.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/959502API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/959502MCP
get_claim(id=959502)