Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The 73% vs. 46% data comes from a single-source experimental sharing, large-scale multi-scenario replication validation has not yet been observed, and the experimental setup has not been fully disclosed.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/30/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/29/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe comparative experiment did not disclose specific dataset sizes, evaluation metrics, or details of comparison fairness, all of which affect the generalizability of its conclusions.72% similarUnverifiedMultiple large-scale studies in the natural sciences have shown that more than half of published experimental results are difficult to reproduce by independent teams.71% similarUnverifiedTop academic deepfake detectors can see their accuracy plummet from 99% to below 60% when faced with previously unseen generative models, a phenomenon known as the cross-model generalization problem.70% similarVerifiedIn scenarios with extreme class imbalance, even an accuracy as high as 95% may indicate that the model is completely unable to identify the minority class.69% similarUnverifiedA study found that approximately one-third of the data sources cited by Perplexity do not actually contain the number it claims.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/960489API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/960489MCP
get_claim(id=960489)